• 구독신청
  • My스크랩
  • 지면신문
FNTIMES 대한민국 최고 금융 경제지
ad

S-OIL’s Cautious Approach to Fundraising: Focus on Controlling Borrowing Expansion

이성규 기자

lsk0603@fntimes.com

기사입력 : 2025-02-24 16:01

350 Billion KRW Demand Forecast, 10-Year Bonds Included Again, but Issuance Size Gradually Decreasing

Photo=S-Oil Mapo Office Building

Photo=S-Oil Mapo Office Building

[Korea Financial Times, Lee Sungkyu] S-OIL appears to have carefully considered its fundraising strategy. Despite being evaluated as one of the highest-rated AA-grade companies, the company cannot overlook the sharp increase in its outstanding debt.

According to the investment banking (IB) industry on the 24th, S-OIL is conducting a demand forecast for the issuance of public corporate bonds worth 350 billion KRW. The bond maturities are structured as follows: 3-year (200 billion KRW), 5-year (70 billion KRW), 7-year (30 billion KRW), and 10-year (50 billion KRW).

The company has proposed an interest rate band of -30 to +30 basis points (bp) relative to the average private bond evaluation yield for each maturity. Depending on demand forecast results, the issuance size may increase to a maximum of 440 billion KRW. The funds raised will be used entirely for debt repayment.

The joint bookrunners include Samsung Securities, NH Investment & Securities, Shinhan Investment, KB Securities, and Mirae Asset Securities. Daishin Securities, Hana Securities, and iM Securities are participating in underwriting.

S-OIL’s credit rating is AA+ according to Korea Investors Service (KIS), while Korea Ratings (KR) and NICE Investors Service rate it at AA0. However, both KR and NICE have assigned a “Positive” outlook, suggesting a likely upgrade to AA+.

Currently, S-OIL’s private bond evaluation yield for each maturity is lower than the AA+ average yield, indicating that its credit profile is stronger than AA0-rated bonds used for comparison.

For the 10-year bond, the AA+ credit spread (credit yield minus government bond yield) stands at 88bp, while S-OIL’s private bond evaluation yield spread is 54bp. The AA0 credit spread is significantly higher at 122bp.

Source=Financial Investment Association

Source=Financial Investment Association

The government bond yield currently shows a 10-year yield of 2.875%, which is lower than the 7-year yield (2.886%). Typically, longer-term yields are higher, but long-term rates often align with economic growth forecasts. This suggests market concerns about a potential slowdown in Korea’s economic growth.

In such periods, corporate bond issuance can become more challenging, as funds tend to flow into government bonds or high-credit corporate bonds. Even high-rated companies may find it difficult to issue long-term bonds in large amounts.

S-OIL’s bond yield levels indicate that it is among the highest-rated AA+ issuers. However, unlike government bonds, its 10-year bond yield is not lower than its 7-year bond yield. Looking at the credit spreads, they narrow progressively for the 3-year, 5-year, and 7-year bonds but widen significantly for the 10-year bond.

A higher credit spread for the 10-year bond may appeal to investors. Notably, no other domestic refining or petrochemical company issued a 10-year bond last year, nor has any done so this year prior to S-OIL’s issuance.

This suggests that S-OIL is confident in its “top-tier AA+ credit standing.” If investors seek safer investments, demand for S-OIL’s long-term bonds could increase.

S-OIL’s Focus on Debt Management Amid Heavy Investment Burden

Another noteworthy aspect of S-OIL’s bond issuance is the size of the potential upscaling. Recently, companies have been able to increase their issuance volume by up to twice the initial demand forecast amount. However, S-OIL has set its maximum issuance size at 440 billion KRW, corresponding to the amount of its bonds maturing in March. If demand forecast results are unsatisfactory, the company plans to use its existing cash reserves to cover the remaining balance.

This approach can be indirectly understood through credit rating agencies’ criteria for rating adjustments. While KR has assigned an AA+ rating, as of Q3 2023, S-OIL has met some conditions for a potential downgrade.

KIS and NICE have given a “Positive” outlook but have set downgrade triggers that could revert their ratings to “Stable.” This reflects the combination of increased debt due to large-scale investments (such as the Shaheen Project) and deteriorating profitability amid a downturn in the refining and petrochemical industries.

The “Shaheen Project” is part of a strategic initiative led by S-OIL’s largest shareholder, Saudi Aramco. In addition to issuing corporate bonds, S-OIL has been in ongoing discussions with Aramco and financial institutions regarding funding. However, the company appears to be maintaining a cautious stance on increasing its financial burden.

An IB industry insider commented, “S-OIL has historically had a lower credit spread compared to the average for its rating grade. While it has issued 10-year bonds since 2023, the issuance size has been gradually decreasing.” He added, “The longer the maturity, the higher the interest cost. Given the need to manage its debt scale, S-OIL is likely to remain cautious in significantly expanding its bond issuance.”

Lee Sungkyu (lsk0603@fntimes.com)

데일리 금융경제뉴스 FNTIMES - 저작권법에 의거 상업적 목적의 무단 전재, 복사, 배포 금지
Copyright ⓒ 한국금융신문 & FNTIMES.com

가장 핫한 경제 소식! 한국금융신문의 ‘추천뉴스’를 받아보세요~

KFT Topic 다른 기사

1 Cathode Rivals L&F and Ecopro BM: Why a Two-to-One Gap in Share Gains? As the EV "chasm" (a temporary slowdown in demand) passes its trough, led by Europe's compact-car segment, the share prices of cathode-material twins L&F and Ecopro BM are also riding an upward trend. Yet the two firms' gains diverge, with L&F outpacing Ecopro BM.Both are leading domestic materials companies whose mainstay is battery cathode materials. They share much in common, from their core business down to their choice of ESS (Energy Storage Systems) as a future breakthrough. So why the current gap in their share-price gains?The difference is read as stemming from the market's dif 2 "Where Did All the Cash Go?" — Why KT and LG Uplus Can't Break Above Book Value This is part of the Korea Financial Times "DQN (Data Quality News)" series, which analyzes companies using objective, data-driven metrics. "Korea Discount" refers to the persistent tendency of Korean equities to trade at lower valuations than global peers; the government's "Value-up Program," launched in 2024, aims to address it by encouraging better shareholder returns and capital efficiency. [Editor's note]Cash-generating power has recovered, but the market's assessment has barely budged. A corporate value that falls woefully short of book value — this is the reality facing Korea's three te 3 Hyundai Wia Bets on Robots and EVs—With an Eye on Succession Hyundai Wia, an affiliate of Hyundai Motor Group, is showing signs of a business overhaul. After selling off its machine-tool business—the company's founding operation—last year, it is now reviewing the sale of even its lucrative defense division to fellow group affiliate Hyundai Rotem. The plan is to fill the resulting void with robotics operations and electrification businesses such as thermal management.Industry observers interpret this as a business restructuring in line with Hyundai Motor Group's strategy of vertical integration. At the same time, some view it as groundwork for successi
ad
ad

한국금융 포럼 사이버관

더보기

FT카드뉴스

더보기
[그래픽 뉴스] 퇴근 후 주차했는데 수익 발생? V2G의 정체
[그래픽 뉴스] “전쟁 신호를 읽는 가장 이상한 방법, 피자 주문량”
[그래픽 뉴스] 트럼프의 ‘타코 한 입’에 흔들린 시장의 비밀
[그래픽 뉴스] 청년정책 5년 계획, 무엇이 달라지나?
[카드뉴스] KT&G, ‘CDP’ 기후변화·수자원 관리 부문 우수기업 선정

FT도서

더보기