• 구독신청
  • My스크랩
  • 지면신문
FNTIMES 대한민국 최고 금융 경제지
ad

Naver Grows Steadily While Coupang Smiles Quietly: Why?

박슬기 기자

seulgi@fntimes.com

기사입력 : 2025-11-18 09:42

◇ Coupang and Naver achieve record-breaking performance side by side
◇ Coupang, under fire at parliamentary audit, takes 'quiet approach'
◇ Naver highlights 'presence' in retail following IT dominance

Created by Gemini

Created by Gemini

이미지 확대보기
[Korea Financial Times, Park seulgi] Coupang and Naver both posted record-breaking Q3 results this year, further solidifying their duopoly in e-commerce. However, the expressions of these two companies receiving excellent report cards differ.

While Coupang, which faced concentrated fire over various issues at this year's parliamentary audit, chose a "quiet approach" over an "earnings celebration," Naver is increasingly expanding its presence in the retail industry by highlighting its commerce business that grew significantly based on artificial intelligence (AI).

According to the industry on November 17, Coupang recorded consolidated revenue of KRW 12.8455 trillion (USD 9.27 billion at an average quarterly exchange rate of KRW 1,386.16) in Q3 2025. This represents a 20% increase compared to the same period in 2024. During this period, operating profit increased 51.5% to KRW 224.5 billion (USD 162 million), and net profit rose 51% to KRW 131.6 billion (USD 95 million).

During the same period, Naver's consolidated revenue increased 15.6% from Q3 2024 to KRW 3.1381 trillion. Within this, Naver commerce revenue grew 35.9% year-over-year to KRW 985.5 billion, accounting for 31% of total revenue. This represents a 4 percentage point expansion from Q3 2024 (27%), establishing itself as a business division driving the group's overall growth.

The fortress of these two giants is already solid. Coupang is the overwhelming number one in the direct purchase (1P) market, while Naver is the number one player in the open market (3P) sector. According to National Data Office statistics, Coupang held 22.7% and Naver held 20.7% of the domestic e-commerce market share in 2024.

The two companies share nearly half of the domestic market. In terms of gross merchandise value (GMV), both companies exceed KRW 50 trillion, dividing the market between them. According to Wiseapp Retail, Coupang's GMV in 2024 was KRW 55.0861 trillion, while Naver's was KRW 50.3 trillion.

However, despite the "record-breaking performance" title, Coupang cannot simply smile. As the e-commerce leader, it has often been beaten like "the nail that sticks out gets hammered down." Concentrated fire continued at this year's parliamentary audit as well.

At the parliamentary audit, negative issues emerged daily, including allegations of pressuring an incumbent prosecutor, excessively long settlement cycles, controversies over high intermediary fees and forced advertising, and labor environment problems. Given the symbolism of being the industry's number one, the company is keeping a low profile despite strong performance, receiving greater attention.

Perhaps understanding Coupang's sentiment, Bloomberg recently published an article titled "Coupang Sets Sales Record but Posts Disappointing Profit." The background is that although Coupang recorded an operating profit of KRW 224.5 billion in Q3 2025, up 51.5% from the same period in 2024, it fell short of Wall Street analyst expectations (approximately KRW 291.3 billion).

Bloomberg analyzed that "Coupang is in fierce competition with other e-commerce companies including AliExpress, Temu, and Naver."

While Coupang fell short of market expectations, it clearly achieved outstanding results across the entire domestic retail industry. This contrasts with competitors like SSG.com and Lotte ON, which are still focused on improving profitability and struggling to reduce their deficits.

Shinsegae Group's SSG.com and Gmarket posted poor results again in Q3. SSG.com's revenue decreased 18.3% year-over-year to KRW 318.9 billion, with operating losses increasing by KRW 25.7 billion to KRW 42.2 billion. Gmarket also saw revenue decline 17.1% to KRW 187.1 billion, with operating losses expanding by KRW 6.4 billion to reach KRW 24.4 billion. Lotte Shopping's Lotte ON saw revenue and operating losses decrease 16.0% and 50% to KRW 22.6 billion and KRW 9.6 billion, respectively.

C-commerce platforms (AliExpress, Temu) targeting the Korean market are also experiencing slowing growth due to limitations in product reliability and delivery quality, while mid-sized platforms like WeMakePrice (bankrupt) and TMON (reopening delayed) are threatened with survival itself.

Ultimately, as Bloomberg pointed out, it is becoming clear that Naver is Coupang's real competitor. Bloomberg noted that "Naver, Korea's mainstream portal, is competing with Coupang based on its massive existing user base and comprehensive user data," and that "it has launched the shopping-dedicated platform Naver Plus Store to take market share from Coupang." The publication added that "Naver is expanding its business into fresh food through partnerships with popular platform Kurly, while making massive investments in logistics."

Naver recently announced that its largest annual online shopping event, "Nepda Sale" (a rebranded version of its previous Naver Shopping Festa), surpassed KRW 1 trillion in cumulative sales over two weeks. This represents an average daily sales of KRW 77.2 billion. Naver attributed the success to various events ranging from exclusive products to lowest-price items, delivery competitiveness, and generous discounts and rewards.

Naver's presence is expected to grow further. This is because Naver, the number one open market operator, will reportedly be included in the government's retail statistics survey subjects starting next year. If actually included, this will be the first time Naver is classified as a retail company in official government statistics.

An industry official said, "The duopoly system of Coupang and Naver has become solid enough that it won't be broken in the short term," adding, "However, while Coupang focuses on logistics and infrastructure, Naver is advancing commerce centered on AI and data, so the two companies' growth directions are gradually diverging." The official continued, "Ultimately, which company secures higher efficiency and customer loyalty will be the key variable determining future market share."

Park seulgi (seulgi@fntimes.com)

데일리 금융경제뉴스 FNTIMES - 저작권법에 의거 상업적 목적의 무단 전재, 복사, 배포 금지
Copyright ⓒ 한국금융신문 & FNTIMES.com

가장 핫한 경제 소식! 한국금융신문의 ‘추천뉴스’를 받아보세요~

KFT Topic 다른 기사

1 Growing Reliance on SK Hynix... SK Square's Dilemma While Korea's stock market has repeatedly risen and fallen, the share price volatility of SK Square (402340) has far exceeded the market average.While the KOSPI index rose 72% from the end of 2025, SK Square's share price surged 261%, from KRW 368,000 to KRW 1,327,000 based on the closing price on the 9th. Compared with its low point at the end of June last year, the increase reaches as much as 625%. On the other hand, the share price, which had soared to an intraday high of KRW 2,189,000 on June 23, has plunged nearly 40% from that peak.There is a common denominator behind this repeated patte 2 New '3% Rule' on Duplicate Listings Puts HD Hyundai Robotics, LS Essex in the Crosshairs Subsidiaries established through spin-offs (physical division) can no longer go public without the consent of general shareholders, even if they are small relative to their parent companies. As unlisted subsidiaries spun off from business divisions of large conglomerates are directly affected, major affiliates are now forced to revise their initial public offering (IPO) strategies.Parent Company Boards Given 'Five Key Obligations' and Subject to the '3% Rule'According to industry sources on July 9, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Korea Exchange (KRX) announced on July 6 revisio 3 Hyundai's IPO-Ready Boston Dynamics Runs Into Dual-Listing Roadblock The Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Korea Exchange (KRX) unexpectedly announced detailed guidelines on the "principle ban, exception allowance" rule for dual listings. The move is intended to protect the rights of ordinary shareholders of parent companies from so-called "split listings," which have long been criticized as a problem in Korea's corporate sector.This has also drawn attention to the potential listing of Boston Dynamics, the robotics affiliate of Hyundai Motor Group. While Boston Dynamics avoids the regulations targeting subsidiaries spun off through physical division (
ad
ad

한국금융 포럼 사이버관

더보기

FT카드뉴스

더보기
환전·로또·육아휴직까지 하반기부터 달라지는 제도 TOP11
[그래픽 뉴스] 은퇴후 30년 부모님 세대의 생존전략
[그래픽 뉴스] 퇴근 후 주차했는데 수익 발생? V2G의 정체
[그래픽 뉴스] “전쟁 신호를 읽는 가장 이상한 방법, 피자 주문량”
[그래픽 뉴스] 트럼프의 ‘타코 한 입’에 흔들린 시장의 비밀

FT도서

더보기