• 구독신청
  • My스크랩
  • 지면신문
FNTIMES 대한민국 최고 금융 경제지
ad

'AI Core' HBM4 Competition Strategy Poles Apart: Samsung Electronics 'Solo' vs SK Hynix 'Alliance'

곽호룡 기자

horr@fntimes.com

기사입력 : 2025-12-03 07:27

◇ Samsung Electronics pursues 'one-stop internalization' with self-sufficiency
◇ SK leverages 'collaboration' with TSMC, Hanmi Semiconductor, and others

Created with Gemini

Created with Gemini

이미지 확대보기
[Korea Financial Times, Gwak Horyung] In the High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) market, which has emerged as the core of memory performance in the AI era, Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix have entered a speed competition with diametrically opposite strategies.

From base die to back-end processes, Samsung Electronics plans to secure technological superiority through an internalization strategy encompassing foundry and equipment. In contrast, SK Hynix is leveraging an open collaboration model that mobilizes the entire external ecosystem including TSMC and Hanmi Semiconductor, leading with verified quality and speed.

HBM plays the role of quickly delivering necessary data to GPUs responsible for AI computations within a certain time. No matter how fast the GPU calculates, bottlenecks occur if data is not delivered on time. HBM is a structure that innovatively increases data processing speed by vertically stacking multiple DRAM chips.

Individual DRAM chips that make up HBM are called 'core dies.' The chip located at the bottom layer is specifically designated as the 'base die (logic die).' The base die performs the critical role of directly connecting to the GPU, interpreting signals, and delivering commands to upper core dies.

Until HBM3E (5th generation), memory companies produced base dies using their own DRAM processes, but from HBM4 (6th generation), foundry (contract manufacturing) methods utilizing cutting-edge fine processes are being introduced to improve speed and power efficiency.

SK Hynix is entrusting HBM4 base die production to Taiwan's TSMC. This is because the company judged that process optimization collaboration with TSMC is essential to meet performance requirements demanded by customers. SK Hynix is known to plan to utilize TSMC's 3-nanometer (nm) and 12nm processes. Standard products for servers will be manufactured with 12nm, while customized products such as Nvidia premium GPUs and Google's custom chips (TPU) are expected to be produced with 3nm processes.

In contrast, Samsung Electronics produces HBM4 base dies using its own foundry 4nm process. Although negotiations with customers over price and volume are variables, if Samsung Electronics secures prices similar to SK Hynix, it can create a relatively higher profit structure through internalization.

Samsung Electronics, a latecomer in HBM, has a strategy of securing customers by leveraging technological capabilities. Samsung Electronics applies the 1c (6th generation) process to HBM4 DRAM.

This is choosing a process one generation ahead of SK Hynix, which maintains the 1b (5th generation) process applied to existing HBM3E for HBM4 as well.

The HBM4 performance disclosed by the two companies in October also shows differences.

Samsung Electronics specifically presented data transfer (I/O) speed and bandwidth at maximum 11Gbps and 2.8TB per second, respectively. SK Hynix only disclosed minimum levels as 'above 10Gbps' and 'above 2.6TB.' This means that even the minimum standards meet Nvidia's enhanced performance requirements.

An industry official said, "For Samsung Electronics, securing yield is key," adding, "As a leading HBM company, SK Hynix's intention to prioritize stable supply is evident."

Packaging (back-end process) strategies also differ significantly between the two companies. The core back-end process in HBM is a type of bonding process that connects stacked DRAMs. From HBM4 20-stack and above, hybrid bonding is required for yield stabilization, but previous generations are likely to maintain existing technologies.

SK Hynix uses the 'MR-MUF process' that fills the space between chips with liquid protective material after soldering. The TC (thermal compression) bonder equipment that temporarily fixes chips to substrates and chips to chips just before this process is supplied by Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and others. Since even slight misalignment causes defects, TC bonders for HBM4 are known as expensive equipment costing approximately KRW 4 billion per unit.

If SK Hynix can be likened to 'applying wood glue,' Samsung Electronics can be compared to 'attaching double-sided tape.' This is the 'TC-NCF' method that inserts film-type protective material between layers and proceeds with thermal compression. Samsung Electronics mainly receives TC bonder supplies from its subsidiary SEMES.

Gwak Horyung (horr@fntimes.com)

데일리 금융경제뉴스 FNTIMES - 저작권법에 의거 상업적 목적의 무단 전재, 복사, 배포 금지
Copyright ⓒ 한국금융신문 & FNTIMES.com

가장 핫한 경제 소식! 한국금융신문의 ‘추천뉴스’를 받아보세요~

KFT Topic 다른 기사

1 LIG D&A, Hanwha Systems Enter Full-Scale Rivalry as Defense AI Battle Reaches the Boardroom LIG Defense & Aerospace (LIG D&A) and Hanwha Systems — both regarded as the "brains" of South Korea's defense industry — have launched an all-out "battle of minds," spanning next-generation weapons system procurement competitions and the recruitment of artificial intelligence (AI) talent for their boards of directors, as the two companies compete for dominance on the future battlefield.Contract Battle Heats Up Across Land and SeaLIG D&A (CEO Shin Ik-hyeon) has recently been intensifying its capabilities in command, control, communications, computers, and intelligence (C4I) and in 2 The Robot Gamble: Doosan Robotics CEO Bets Big on North America Despite 11 Straight Years in the Red Doosan Robotics has not recorded a profit even once since its founding in 2015 — 11 consecutive years of losses through last year. Yet its stock price continues to rise. How does one explain this? Amid controversy over overvaluation, Park In-won, the fourth-generation heir of the Doosan founding family who has led the company since late 2022, has placed a bold bet on expanded North American investment and a pivot to becoming a solutions company. What has been the result?Market Cap of KRW 5 Trillion... KRW 59.5 Billion in Operating LossesDoosan Robotics is a collaborative robot (cobot) company 3 Samsung SDI's Returns Run Six Times That of LG Energy Solution… But Why? "Will the era of K-Battery rise again?" More investors have been asking that question of late, as shares of LG Energy Solution and Samsung SDI have been on an upward trajectory this year.Still, one cannot invest in both companies simultaneously — and if a strategic choice must be made, which one should investors pick? The instinctive answer from many is LG Energy Solution — after all, isn't it South Korea's top battery maker?But the reality is a bit different. Shareholder returns at Samsung SDI have been running roughly six times higher than those at LG Energy Solution.The gap between the tw
ad
ad
ad

한국금융 포럼 사이버관

더보기

FT카드뉴스

더보기
[그래픽 뉴스] “전쟁 신호를 읽는 가장 이상한 방법, 피자 주문량”
[그래픽 뉴스] 트럼프의 ‘타코 한 입’에 흔들린 시장의 비밀
[그래픽 뉴스] 청년정책 5년 계획, 무엇이 달라지나?
[카드뉴스] KT&G, ‘CDP’ 기후변화·수자원 관리 부문 우수기업 선정
[그래픽 뉴스] “AI가 소프트웨어를 무너뜨린다? 사스포칼립스의 진실”

FT도서

더보기
ad
ad