• 구독신청
  • My스크랩
  • 지면신문
FNTIMES 대한민국 최고 금융 경제지
ad

Intensified Competition, Trump Risk, and Oversupply... Samsung Biologics CEO John Rim Faces Mounting Challenges Amid Uncertainty

김나영 기자

steaming@fntimes.com

기사입력 : 2025-03-25 16:54

◇ Hopes for Gains from the Trump Administration Dashed by '25% Tariffs'
◇ The Pros and Cons of 'Aggressive Investments'... Enhancing Competitiveness vs. Declining Operating Profit Margins

Intensified Competition, Trump Risk, and Oversupply... Samsung Biologics CEO John Rim Faces Mounting Challenges Amid Uncertainty
[Korea Financial Times, Kim Nayoung] Even as Samsung Biologics (hereinafter referred to as Samsung Bio) continues its strong growth, aiming for annual revenue of KRW 5 trillion this year, uncertainties persist.

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has signaled a tariff war, and the competition for dominance in the CDMO sector is intensifying. With rising domestic and international uncertainties, attention is focused on the leadership of Samsung Bio CEO John Rim.

The second term of the Trump administration is one of the biggest variables for the biotech industry. Initially, domestic biotech firms anticipated benefits from the Trump administration’s ‘Biological Security Act,’ but they now face the unexpected hurdle of heavy tariffs. The Biological Security Act, designed to curb Chinese firms, was expected to provide a competitive advantage to South Korean biotech companies.

However, recent remarks by Trump about imposing at least a 25% tariff on pharmaceuticals have altered the outlook. In response, biotech firms with significant exports to the U.S., such as Celltrion and SK Biopharmaceuticals, have quickly announced countermeasures.

Unlike its peers, Samsung Bio has opted to monitor the situation until detailed policies are unveiled. It appears that the company finds it burdensome to make major decisions, such as expanding local production facilities, before the specifics of the tariff policies are confirmed.

Samsung Bio’s revenue from the U.S. market amounted to KRW 1.1741 trillion last year, accounting for 25.8% of its total revenue—second only to Europe (65.1%).

Concerns over potential oversupply remain another key issue. While the CDMO market is growing at an annual rate of 8–10%, making a supply glut unlikely in the near future, demand for biopharmaceuticals is surging, leading some analysts to predict a worsening capacity shortage instead. However, as the market expands, so does competition.

In South Korea alone, large conglomerates and traditional pharmaceutical companies are rushing into the CDMO business. Lotte Group has launched Lotte Biologics, while SK Group is expanding into the market through SK Pharmteco and SK Bioscience. Traditional pharmaceutical giants, including Yuhan Corporation, GC Biopharma, Chong Kun Dang, Hanmi Pharmaceutical, and Daewoong Pharmaceutical—collectively regarded as the ‘Top 5’—have also entered the CDMO sector.

More recently, Celltrion has joined the fray. In December last year, the company established a specialized CDMO subsidiary, Celltrion Biosolutions, and plans to begin construction of production facilities in the first half of this year.

Given these developments, some experts argue that a long-term approach to managing potential oversupply risks is necessary. A biotech industry insider stated, “While the CDMO market looks promising for the foreseeable future, risks still exist. In particular, it remains uncertain how long the excess demand for contract manufacturing (CMO) will persist.”

Regarding these concerns, CEO John Rim remarked, “There are voices worrying about oversupply, but this is irrelevant to us. The contracts Samsung Bio has secured are not short-term but rather long-term agreements spanning 5–7 years, and the demand for pharmaceuticals continues to grow.”

John Rim’s strategy of securing a technological edge has yielded both advantages and disadvantages. While he has driven rapid company growth through extensive capacity expansion, concerns have been raised that sustained large-scale capital investments may hinder improvements in operating profit margins. Indeed, Samsung Bio’s annual operating profit margin has been on a decline: 34.3% in 2021, 32.8% in 2022, 30.1% in 2023, and 29.0% in 2024.

An industry official commented, “So far, major contract wins have helped mitigate risk factors, but if new investments unexpectedly fail, it could impact the company’s financial stability.”

Kim Nayoung, Korea Finacial Times (steaming@fntimes.com)

데일리 금융경제뉴스 FNTIMES - 저작권법에 의거 상업적 목적의 무단 전재, 복사, 배포 금지
Copyright ⓒ 한국금융신문 & FNTIMES.com

기자의 기사 더보기 전체보기

가장 핫한 경제 소식! 한국금융신문의 ‘추천뉴스’를 받아보세요~

KFT Topic 다른 기사

1 Why Is Kia's Stock Lagging Despite Beating Hyundai on Earnings? Kia posted record first-half sales this year, driven by an expanded electrified lineup, despite uncertainties such as U.S. tariffs. The gain stands out even more considering that its "older brother," Hyundai Motor, struggled with sluggish sales during the same period.Yet a look at Total Shareholder Return (TSR) for the two companies raises questions. Despite Kia's stronger earnings, its TSR stood at just 60%, while Hyundai's reached 110% — nearly double. The gap reflects the added premium investors place on Hyundai as it leads future businesses such as robotics and AI (artificial intelligence 2 Inefficient Capital Allocation Holds Back Hyundai Motor's Stock Despite Record Profit Despite posting record-breaking earnings, Hyundai Motor is facing criticism that inefficient capital allocation is holding back the enhancement of its corporate value. Chief among the concerns are non-core equity stakes and funds tied up in real estate. Stock price gains that had surged earlier this year on expectations for growth in the robotics business have largely been given back. Amid declining investment efficiency across management overall, controversy surrounding Hyundai Motor Group Chairman Chung Eui-sun's expanded personal stake in Boston Dynamics is also seen as weighing on the stoc 3 "Turned to a Millstone by the Chasm": SK's EV Trio — When Will Normalization Come? As the electric vehicle era dawned, the SK Group established or acquired SK On (batteries), SK Nexilis (copper foil), and SK Signet (chargers) through its holding company and intermediate holding companies. The plan was to use these EV-related businesses as new growth engines.But when the EV chasm — a temporary slowdown in demand — hit starting in 2023, these once-promising ventures turned into liabilities. As earnings deteriorated and the financial burden on parent companies grew, the three became prime targets in the group's rebalancing efforts.While SK Group's EV affiliates have kept aflo
ad
ad

한국금융 포럼 사이버관

더보기

FT카드뉴스

더보기
환전·로또·육아휴직까지 하반기부터 달라지는 제도 TOP11
[그래픽 뉴스] 은퇴후 30년 부모님 세대의 생존전략
[그래픽 뉴스] 퇴근 후 주차했는데 수익 발생? V2G의 정체
[그래픽 뉴스] “전쟁 신호를 읽는 가장 이상한 방법, 피자 주문량”
[그래픽 뉴스] 트럼프의 ‘타코 한 입’에 흔들린 시장의 비밀

FT도서

더보기