• 구독신청
  • My스크랩
  • 지면신문
FNTIMES 대한민국 최고 금융 경제지
ad

Hyundai Mobis Goes All-In on Robots and Chips. Is It Becoming a ‘Money Pit’?

김재훈 기자

rlqm93@fntimes.com

기사입력 : 2026-10-13 07:52

ROIC stuck at 5%... EVA at –KRW 7.8 trillion
Higher market expectations and cost of capital weigh on the company
Rebound hinges on shedding low-margin units and delivering on electrification

This infographic, originally published by Korea Financial Times, has been reconstructed using generative AI.

This infographic, originally published by Korea Financial Times, has been reconstructed using generative AI.

이미지 확대보기
[Korea Financial Times, Kim JaeHun] Hyundai Mobis is accelerating investment in in-house design of automotive semiconductors and in-sourcing of BMICs (battery management ICs) and BSA (battery system), following its pivot to robotics.

However, with return on invested capital (ROIC) stuck in the 5% range and the cost of invested capital rising every year, the company’s economic value added (EVA) deficit continues to widen.

To improve investment efficiency, Hyundai Mobis is slimming down invested capital and reallocating capital, including by selling low-margin businesses. To enter a phase of genuine value creation, it needs visibility on a medium- to long-term turnaround in robotics, electrification and other areas. The problem is that the timing remains uncertain.

ROIC Stuck Near 5% as Capital Cost Burden Grows

According to THE COMPASS, an AI-powered corporate analysis platform built by Korea Financial Times, Hyundai Mobis’s ROIC was 4.01% in 2022, 4.61% in 2023, 5.28% in 2024 and 5.02% in 2025, moving within a 4–5% range. The forecast for this year is 5.25%, a slight increase.

ROIC is the ratio of net operating profit after tax (NOPAT) generated by the capital invested in operations (invested capital, or IC), and is a key measure of capital efficiency. The lower the figure, the less efficient the investment.

At Hyundai Mobis, investment in robotics, semiconductors and battery in-sourcing enlarges invested capital, so NOPAT must rise at the same time for ROIC to improve. The problem is that, at this stage, revenue leverage is not keeping pace with the scale of investment.

Consider the company’s results over the past five years. Revenue has expanded steadily, from KRW 51.0963 trillion in 2022 to KRW 59.2544 trillion in 2023, KRW 57.2593 trillion in 2024, KRW 60.0824 trillion in 2025 and KRW 63.8 trillion in 2026 (estimate).

Operating profit, however, stood at KRW 2.0265 trillion in 2022, KRW 2.2953 trillion in 2023, KRW 2.5221 trillion in 2024, KRW 2.846 trillion in 2025 and KRW 3.2 trillion in 2026 (estimate). The operating margin rose only from 3.9% in 2022 to about 5.02% in 2026 (estimate), so the company has yet to escape a low-margin structure of 3–5%.

Returns are stagnant, but capital expenditure (CAPEX) is trending upward. Hyundai Mobis’s CAPEX was KRW 1.2 trillion in 2022, KRW 1.9 trillion in 2023 and KRW 2.4 trillion in 2024, rising by more than operating profit did. It fell back to around KRW 1.5 trillion in 2025, but very little of the CAPEX that peaked in 2024 has translated into profit.

THE COMPASS’s analysis of Hyundai Mobis’s 2025 ROIC structure shows a NOPAT margin of 4.09% and a capital turnover ratio of 1.28x. In the low-margin auto parts industry, a 1.28x turnover is not unreasonable. But the structural inefficiency remains unresolved: ROIC, the product of the two factors, falls far short of the cost of capital.

EVA Trapped by Investment Efficiency

Hyundai Mobis’s investment inefficiency also shows up in its weighted average cost of capital (WACC). WACC is the cost of financing, calculated as the weighted average of the cost of equity and the cost of debt (borrowings) within the capital invested. It serves as the profitability benchmark against which ROIC is compared.

Hyundai Mobis’s WACC fell from 24.05% in 2022 to 14.45% in 2023, then rose again to 19.42% in 2024, 19.48% in 2025 and 20.92% in 2026 (estimate).

Within the WACC, the cost of debt is very low at 0.83%. With leverage of only 0.07x and debt accounting for about 31.5% of capital, borrowing costs themselves are not a burden on management. The problem is the cost of equity, which accounts for the remaining 68.5%.

The cost of equity is the annual growth rate a company would need to achieve to justify its current market capitalization, worked out in reverse. It represents the implied growth expectation (shareholders’ required return) the market assigns to the company. The higher the figure, the greater the market’s expectations, and failing to meet them puts downward pressure on the share price.

The cost of equity that shareholders (the market) require of Hyundai Mobis is 30.26%, which fell from 35.1% in 2022 before rising again. This suggests the market is attaching a considerable premium to Hyundai Mobis’s investment performance. With a capital structure that relies little on debt, a high cost of equity has become entrenched as the factor pulling up the overall WACC.

In short, shareholders and investors have high hopes for investment aimed at transforming the company’s fundamentals through robotics, semiconductors and battery in-sourcing, but the company has yet to turn those hopes into results.

The indicator that reveals this situation is the ROIC–WACC spread. A positive spread means ROIC exceeds the weighted average cost of capital and the company is creating value. A negative spread means returns fall short of the cost of capital and value is being destroyed, indicating a need for structural improvement.

Hyundai Mobis’s ROIC–WACC spread was –20.04% in 2022, –9.84% in 2023, –14.14% in 2024, –14.46% in 2025 and –15.67% in 2026 (estimate). The improvement seen temporarily in 2023 has since reversed.

EVA, which represents a company’s economic value added, is estimated at –KRW 7.8 trillion on an annualized basis from cumulative results through the second quarter of 2026. That is more than double the deficit of –KRW 3.8 trillion in 2023.

When Will the New Businesses Deliver?

The conditions for a Hyundai Mobis turnaround are clear. For ROIC to converge toward WACC, either the current ROIC of about 5.25% must rise meaningfully, or the cost of equity the market requires (30.26%) must come down.

The path to improving ROIC that Hyundai Mobis is now pursuing is for sales of high-margin semiconductor and electronic components, such as BMICs, to take off once in-sourcing is complete, while capital turnover improves at the same time through capital reallocation.

For now, Hyundai Mobis is selling low-margin businesses to secure liquidity and improve efficiency.

The definitive agreement for the sale of its lamp business, disclosed on September 30, is interpreted as a sweeping restructuring to shed a representative low-margin legacy component and slim down invested capital, timed with its shift to focus on technology.

The cash and capital coming in from the sale of low-margin businesses will be used to secure liquidity and to concentrate R&D resources on semiconductors and electrification. This could act as a practical catalyst for narrowing the ROIC–WACC spread.

Automotive semiconductors and battery in-sourcing, which the company has made strategic high-margin businesses alongside robotics, are also gaining momentum. Hyundai Mobis’s BSA business entered full-scale mass production and supply in the second half of this year, when the build-out of its production bases in North America (including Georgia) and its joint-venture plant in Indonesia was completed. In semiconductors, the company is running a roadmap to apply next-generation SiC (silicon carbide) power semiconductors and its proprietary BMIC chips in phases across the electrification and SDV (software-defined vehicle) platforms of the group’s automakers by 2030.

“If Hyundai Mobis fully installs its proprietary BMICs and SiC power semiconductors in hybrid and EREV (extended-range electric vehicle) systems, where demand is high, and monetizes low-margin businesses in parallel, the pace of the ROIC rebound could accelerate through a higher NOPAT margin,” said an official at a securities firm.

Kim JaeHun (rlqm93@fntimes.com)

데일리 금융경제뉴스 FNTIMES - 저작권법에 의거 상업적 목적의 무단 전재, 복사, 배포 금지
Copyright ⓒ 한국금융신문 & FNTIMES.com

가장 핫한 경제 소식! 한국금융신문의 ‘추천뉴스’를 받아보세요~

KFT Topic 다른 기사

1 In the Black, Short on Cash: Hanwha Solutions Injects KRW 400 Billion into Its U.S. Solar Unit Hanwha Solutions is injecting more than KRW 400 billion in working capital into the entity that operates its U.S. solar module plant. The parent is, in effect, funding the operating costs of a U.S. business that is posting profits.What is behind this? Much of the U.S. unit’s profit comes from tax credits, and the plant needs cash to keep running until those credits are converted into cash. For Hanwha Solutions, which cut the size of its capital increase in half this year, it is one more burden.Profitable on paper, loss-making at the plantHanwha Solutions recently disclosed that its U.S. subsi 2 Samsung SDI Taps POSCO Future M for LFP, EcoPro BM for Solid-State Materials Samsung SDI is reshaping its battery materials supply chain through back-to-back partnerships with South Korean cathode makers. It signed a long-term supply contract with POSCO Future M for lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cathode materials, aiming to meet demand in the fast-growing energy storage system (ESS) market. It also began joint development of key solid-state battery materials, including cathode materials and electrolytes, with EcoPro BM.The core of these partnerships is not simply adding more cathode suppliers. Their significance lies in building a stable supply chain by linking LFP, who 3 Kolon Industries’ 67% Return Outpaces SKC’s 22% as Restructuring Strategies Diverge Shareholder returns at Kolon Industries and SKC have diverged, even though both companies are moving away from chemical- and film-centered businesses toward high-value-added materials and other growth areas. The gap stems from the different speeds at which they restructured their businesses.Korea Financial Times calculated the total shareholder return (TSR) of the two companies over the roughly two years and nine months from January 2, 2024 to September 30, 2026. The results came to 67% for Kolon Industries and 22% for SKC.TSR is a metric that shows the total return earned by shareholders by r
ad
ad

한국금융 포럼 사이버관

더보기

FT카드뉴스

더보기
[그래픽 뉴스] ‘순대’가 경제용어라고? 순(純)대외자산, 한국의 진짜 해외자산은 얼마일까?
[그래픽 뉴스] ISA 대개편! 나에게 유리한 계좌는?
[그래픽 뉴스] 미국 증시 새로운 키워드 'MANGOS'
환전·로또·육아휴직까지 하반기부터 달라지는 제도 TOP11
[그래픽 뉴스] 은퇴후 30년 부모님 세대의 생존전략

FT도서

더보기